2003年9月14日 星期日

Lloyd Webber to leave his art collection to the nation

By James Morrison, Arts and Media Correspondent
Sunday, 14 September 2003

Lord Lloyd-Webber is to leave his priceless art collection in trust to the nation when he dies - together with sets and costumes from the musicals that earned him his millions.

Lord Lloyd-Webber is to leave his priceless art collection in trust to the nation when he dies - together with sets and costumes from the musicals that earned him his millions.

The songwriter and impresario has unveiled plans to put his vast array of art works and theatrical memorabilia on public display after his death in a museum at Sydmonton Court, his sprawling country home in Berkshire.

Lloyd Webber makes his pledge publicly on television this week, on the eve of the opening of an exhibition of his Pre-Raphaelite and 20th-century masters at the Royal Academy. He details the scheme further in an interview with the latest edition of the London gallery's own magazine, in which he outlines plans for visitors to be ferried to his house in batches from a "staging post" by the nearby A34.

Lloyd Webber's philanthropic gesture will be especially welcomed by fans of Victorian art, as his Pre-Raphaelite collection is regarded as one of the world's finest. It includes one of only five oil paintings by Dante Gabriel Rossetti in private hands and enough works by Sir Edward Burne-Jones to fill the RA's largest room.

Among the other highlights of the exhibition will be Picasso's Blue Period portrait, Angel Fernandez de Soto, famously bought by the peer for £18m, and Canaletto's The Old Horse Guards from St James's Park.

Lloyd Webber's extraordinary promise to leave his collection to posterity in his will is made as he gives Lord Bragg a guided tour of Sydmonton on a special edition on Friday of ITV1's The South Bank Show. Standing beside Richard Dadd's Contradiction: Oberon and Titania, a painting that is now so fragile he has been advised never to lend it out again, the 55-year-old peer says: "It will be eventually part of my whole plan to put my entire art collection, hopefully in situ, when I am dead ... on display."

In the RA magazine, he adds: "We've bought a site near Sydmonton, which could be a staging post. I think people would quite like to see the collection in the context of where I lived. That's my wish: to keep it in one place."

It is not just Lloyd Webber's art collection which will be put on public view after his death. The proposed displays will house props, sets and costumes from his most celebrated stage musicals, among them Cats, Starlight Express and The Phantom of the Opera. He is undecided about whether to charge the public for viewing the collection.

Lloyd Webber's new appetite for philanthropy has received an idiosyncratic welcome from Norman Rosenthal, the RA's exhibitions secretary. While describing the loaned artworks as looking "like the proverbial million dollars", he said of the peer: "He's like Charles Saatchi. Both of them are, in the nicest sense of the word, insecure about what they are doing. All great collectors have a touch of madness about them."

'Pre-Raphaelites and Other Masters: The Andrew Lloyd Webber Collection' runs at the Royal Academy from 20 September until 12 December

2003年9月7日 星期日

Meet Mr Kim, the Britart benefactor who has Damien Hirst and Saatchi in his sights

By Robin Stummer
Sunday, 7 September 2003

As Damien Hirst's first solo exhibition for eight years opens this week in London, the artist's major new benefactor, poised to replace Charles Saatchi as Britart's bankroller-in-chief, can be revealed as a mysterious South Korean millionaire-cum-artist.

As Damien Hirst's first solo exhibition for eight years opens this week in London, the artist's major new benefactor, poised to replace Charles Saatchi as Britart's bankroller-in-chief, can be revealed as a mysterious South Korean millionaire-cum-artist.

Kim Chang-il, a collector, entrepreneur and self-proclaimed aesthete, is the mastermind of an assault on London's claim to be the natural home of great British modern art.

Mr Kim, The Independent on Sunday can reveal, has bought Charity, the massive centrepiece of the new Hirst show, opening this Wednesday. He intends Charity - a 22ft-high, six-ton bronze based on the 1960s Spastics Society collection box girl - to be the crowning glory of his extensive collection of modern art, much of it British.

Mr Kim's investment means that the epicentre of the highly lucrative Britart revolution could well shift 5,500 miles from the heart of London to Cheonan, the anonymous shopping-and-sleeping suburb of Seoul, South Korea, where he keeps his art. Here, from next month, you will find one of the world's greatest private collections of Britart from the past 10 years, housed in a new gallery space specially created for dozens of works - including pieces by two enfants terribles, Damien Hirst and Tracey Emin. Farewell Saatchi's Cool Britannia, hello Kim's Cool Korea.

On the face of it, Mr Kim is an unlikely successor to Charles Saatchi. Aged 53, Mr Kim made his fortune in retail and transport, and owns a chain of 14 restaurants, as well as a department store and entertainment complex.

The store, called Arario, has an art gallery housing hundreds of modern artworks culled from around the world, but for the past 15 years Mr Kim has been focusing on buying work created in Britain. As well as pieces by Hirst, he owns five works by Emin, and others by Jake and Dinos Chapman, Mona Hatoum, Marc Quinn, Gilbert & George and Antony Gormley.

Two years ago Mr Kim paid £1.3m for Hirst's Hymn, a 20ft-high sculpture in the style of a medical student's model of the human body, and installed it in the entrance to his department store. Around the same time, another version of Hymn was bought by Charles Saatchi for about £1m.

Though Mr Kim has long been known to art dealers, his sudden arrival as a key player on the international gallery circuit comes as the rift between Hirst and Mr Saatchi appears to be widening. Interviewed on Radio 4's Front Row last week, Hirst said he had no interest in Mr Saatchi's showpiece new modern art gallery on the South Bank, London, which has staged a retrospective of Hirst's work. "I think museums are for dead artists," he said. "I've seen all that work before in Charles's place. I don't think I'd like it really." Earlier this year, Hirst was conspicuously absent from the Saatchi Gallery's opening night party, calling the gallery "pointless" and "a waste of time".

If anything, Mr Kim's vision of how to offer modern British art to the public is even more acute and astute than Mr Saatchi's. "My dream is to provide the customer with what he or she wants," he says in the latest edition of the Art Newspaper, "but constantly to raise the consumer's expectation, to encourage them to dream... As a businessman I want the customer to see my art and the art of others and be rewarded with pleasure."

"Mr Kim is very happy with Charity," a spokeswoman for the Arario Gallery told The Independent on Sunday last week. "It complements Hymn. We are interested in modern art that is cutting edge, and British art is certainly that."

Charity is to be the centrepiece of Romance in the Age of Uncertainty, a major exhibition of Hirst's recent work that opens this week at the White Cube in Hoxton, east London. Mr Kim's office declined to reveal how much he has paid for Charity, but a figure in excess of the £1.3m paid for Hymn is likely. Art market sources told the IoS that all works at the Hirst exhibition have already been sold - but to whom?

The White Cube would not reveal any names, but the tally of recent investors in the Hirst oeuvre throws up a strange group of possibilities. Sir Elton John is known to own works by Hirst, and, this summer, David Beckham bought one of his prized "butterfly" works as a fourth wedding anniversary present for his wife, Victoria. And it might be unwise to rule out a Saatchi interest. Married last week to the TV cook Nigella Lawson, he might already have the perfect wedding present on order.

2003年8月24日 星期日

Enfant terrible

From
August 24, 2003

He's given up drink. He's given up drugs. Even more shockingly, Damien Hirst has found God. But dabbling in religious imagery has still left him with blood on his hands

We elect these front-line wild guys to be rebellious in ways we perhaps might be if we were not the wimps we are. So the news that Damien Hirst has given up drink and drugs completely, and that his first one-man show in Britain for a decade is to be devoted overwhelmingly to religious imagery, will send ripples of raw anxiety through the faux-rebel population at large. Oh, no. Not Damien. Not 'the alpha male of British contemporary art', as they call him at the Saatchi Gallery. Not the man who massacres flies by the million and kills killer sharks. Please don't let it be Damien. But it is. Sort of.

I have in my hand as I write - and I think this is an exclusive - a sheaf of poems that Damien
Hirst has produced specially for his new show. That's right. Poems. There are 13 of them. Twelve for each of the apostles and a separate one for Jesus. Each of these poems will accompany a glass box filled with medicinal and symbolic bric-a-brac that seeks also to portray these same 12 apostles and Jesus. 'A trillion dancing spandrels/of light surrounded you,' goes the second of the unexpected poems. 'Slow motion, weightless/ Generous before the blight/soft rotted figs fell from the tree of life.'

When a man starts writing poems about trillions of dancing spandrels of light, and generous figs falling from the tree of life, then his days of rampaging through the Groucho Club high on coke are clearly over and something significant is afoot in his psyche. The glass cabinets, some of which have holes drilled into them at the points where the relevant saints were nailed to the cross, as well as lots of blood, will be fixed to the walls in a dark and gory glazed surround that seeks to set the
tone for Romance in the Age of Uncertainty, as Damien's new show is called.

I think it is safe to conclude that the Age of Uncertainty describes the bad times we are living through, and that Damien himself is on the side of Romance, fragile stuff in our world, as easy to buffet as a butterfly in a gale. 'I remember living in the world of desire/before the age of romance/A love now crushed in the vice-like grip of truth,' he warbles in poem number five. It's not Auden, for sure. But it makes its point atmospherically enough. Things used to be nice. Now they are not.

'Do you believe in God?' I ask him straight out, as we settle down for confessions and explanations in the library of his rambling country residence in Devon. I've been invited to spend the weekend with the corpse meister as he prepares to reveal these dark, new religious conundrums to the public.

'I don't know,' he mumbles back, a tad nervously. 'It's a very complicated word. I mean, you find yourself thinking about death a lot as you get older, and I was starting to think that maybe, when you're older, it becomes the only option or something. Some kind of safety net that you build for yourself. I think it needs revisiting. Let's see, you know. Let's see how the church is getting on. I mean, it's failed so miserably. And they defend it so badly.'

So there you have it. Straight from the shark's mouth. Damien Hirst has sort of found God, and he's sort of making religious art because he sort of feels the church needs him. What we have here, reader, is a wolf who has whipped off his black pelt to reveal the fluffy little baa-lamb hiding beneath.

I have to admit I saw it coming. I have long suspected that the man who saws cows in half and then peeps inquisitively into their expired corpses is himself a big softie inside. My dealings with Damien over the years have divided fairly evenly into encounters with the good Damien and the bad one. The bad one was pretty damn naughty, it has to be said. Everyone knows someone who knows someone who has seen him drop his trousers and insert things into his penis. It was a favourite drinking trick. He'd usually attempt it while staggering about the Groucho Club in the company of that excessively decadent pal of his, Keith Allen, possibly the worst influence on anyone else available in the whole of Britain, and the only star of screen and stage ever to stick his tongue down my throat. It was Keith's horrible way of saying hello. He'd been eating fish.

Those two together were a menace to society on so many psychosocial levels. You may remember them storming up the pop charts a couple of European Championships ago in the unpleasant guise of Fat Les, the manufactured pop moron who put his podgy pop finger on the crude backbeat that activates our nation's football hooligans with a galumphing terrace ditty called Vindaloo. I'm afraid I sang along with it as well.

To my knowledge, Damien Hirst is still the only important British artist ever to appear on
Top of the Pops. Fat Les, sighs Damien, keeps coming back. Like everyone else in the country, he has been on the Atkins diet recently, as part of his spectacular return to healthiness, so he knows what he's talking about when he suggests that Fat Les may be reappearing as Fat Loss.

He looks good. Clean, lean, with a snazzy pair of blue-tinted specs. He's been off toxics since the end of last year and was already sober when his great friend Joe Strummer of the Clash died suddenly of a heart attack a couple of days before Christmas. Joe lived near Damien in Devon. They were close.

When Damien challenges me to a game of snooker in the specially constructed snooker salon attached to his house, and beats me 3-0, with some explosive long-potting, and a few devious little nudges and calls he thought I hadn't spotted, it's the Clash who supply the soundtrack. London Calling blares out again and again from the snooker jukebox.

Damien was a punk back in Leeds, where he grew up. The Clash were his gods. When he went on the wagon, Joe used to try to tempt him off it. He was only 50 when he died. As soon as he heard of Joe's horribly premature death, Damien got a gang of his people over to Joe's house to catalogue and collect everything in Joe's studio, down to the last Rizla paper. He's donating it all to the Rock'n'Roll Hall of Fame, where it will form a shrine to Joe Strummer.

In the old days, in the Age of Inebriation, I met Damien a couple of times at the Glastonbury festival weaving around backstage with large chunks of intoxicant coursing through his veins, mixing it with his pop-star pals - the chaps out of Blur, Strummer, the dreaded Keith Allen out of Fat Les - while his mother, Mary, looked after his children and kept them safe - not easy backstage at Glastonbury. Damien, off his head, in the company of pop stars, was a compelling advertisement for sobriety. His skin had a flaky look to it, as if he too had been immersed overlong in formaldehyde, like that unfortunate shark of his that popped up at the Sensation show moulting chunks of its body into its liquid surrounds. When Damien's hair started to go grey and thin out, it took on a sticky sheen, as if dogs had been licking it. 'I was turning into Jeffrey Bernard,' he now admits.

But even while Damien's decomposition was taking place in full view of the rest of us, there was, of course, another, gentler, kinder, truer, inner Damien on prominent display at the same time: in his work, silly. One of the biggest mysteries in British modern art is how he has managed so successfully to maintain his reputation as a crazed, bloodthirsty shock artist when even the most cursory examination of the stuff he produces reveals a soppy and spectacularly softhearted romantic.

If Damien were a Christmas card he'd be the one with the most robins in it, the one with the whitest snow, the most holly.

For instance, has anyone ever produced art that is quite as sentimental and lovey-dovey as his butterfly pictures? No wonder David Beckham has just bought one for Victoria. A Damien Hirst butterfly picture would melt the heart of Roy Keane, let alone a notorious family man like the boy David: all those beautiful little butterflies, with all those gorgeous colours in their wings, stuck so poignantly to the canvas, in such huge numbers.

Did I know, asks Damien, that he is now Britain's biggest importer of butterflies? No, I certainly did not. His new butterfly pictures use up so many of the things that he cannot get enough of them and has to salvage extra specimens wherever he can. Three people are at work full-time in his studio in Gloucestershire making butterfly pictures. The pictures use more butterflies than ever. So densely are they packed with geometric configurations of lepidopteral wonders that, from a distance, they look like stained-glass windows. When his new show goes up, his butterfly pictures will do their bit by creating a dark, religious glow.

I've interviewed Damien a couple of times before when he was sober and he has always been the soul of politeness: full of insights and snappy opinions. So when all those intriguing rumours began to circulate around the art world that he had cleaned up his act - no more drink or drugs, no more inserting things into his penis - and found God, my ears pricked up. He's joined AA, said the rumour-spreaders. He's following the 12 steps, and that's where God fits in.

Alarmed by these garbled reports of the forest-load of new leaves that he was supposed to have turned over, I fixed up to see him first at his studio, where his new work was being finished for the big show, and then at his house, where he was going to cook me dinner. The last time I went to interview him, for a TV film, he made a delicious wild garlic soup from the plants the two of us picked in his private wood. This time he promised me lamb. I love lamb.

The deal was that I would turn up at the studio after 4 o'clock on a Friday, and then spend the Saturday with him. I couldn't come any earlier because Damien was receiving some buyers. No, it wasn't David Beckham. Just somebody else I shouldn't see. The studio is in a converted factory by the side of a trout stream near Stroud. It's huge. Outside, wrapped in spectacular quantities of swaddling, stands the unmistakable outline of Hymn, the giant medical model of the inside of a man of which Damien has made three casts, one of which Charles Saatchi bought for £1m.

Damien has now fallen out with Saatchi over the hanging of the Damien Hirst retrospective with which Saatchi chose to open his new museum in London's County Hall. Saatchi asked Damien for suggestions, and then ignored them when Damien made some. Even though it contains almost all his best-known work, Damien refuses to see the Saatchi show.

In the middle of his studio is a crucified cow. I never imagined that a cow with its legs outstretched would look this big. What a sight. It's the first of three of them, a bovine recreation of Christ and the two thieves on Calvary, that is due to go on show at the Prada museum in Milan.

Looming even taller is another new work: Charity, a giant little girl clasping a teddy bear, based on those collecting boxes that used to stand outside newsagents, into which we were encouraged to drop our spare change. Charity, who is roughly the height of a double-decker bus, is going to stand in the middle of the square in Hoxton when Damien's new show opens at the White Cube. Alas, her collecting box has been jemmied open. That's what happens to charity in the Age of Uncertainty.

What's that smell, Damien? Oh, that's the fly factory. A chap called James is in there right now stocking it with fresh maggots bought from a fisherman's supplier. Hundreds of the little lovelies are buzzing around James keenly, and they'll soon be joined by thousands more. The fly's role in Damien's art is to die for him. A big, black picture called The Fear consists, I see, when I get up close to it, of nothing but dead flies stuck on in creepy cakes of death, many centimetres thick. Now that's what I call a sacrifice.

Also in the new exhibition will be a work called The Last Supper, which consists of a Formica table around which 13 ping-pong balls are kept up in the air on jets of wine. And a cow with six legs, suspended in formaldehyde. It's a real cow: one of the Almighty's unpleasant little jokes.

Did I know, explains an enthusiastic Damien, as he leads me past the 12 increasingly gory cabinets dripping with deer's blood that represent the apostles, that only one of Jesus's disciples met a natural death? All the rest died violently? No, I didn't. But I can certainly believe it now. By the time he has placed a severed cow's head in front of each of his apostolic cabinets, as he plans to do, his comeback show will have created for itself a macabrely funereal atmosphere worthy of a Christian slaughter in Rome's catacombs. Yes, he's found Jesus, but not perhaps in ways that Cliff Richard would applaud.

I ask about his past. There's nothing much on record about his childhood in Leeds. But the black and gory Catholicism seeping out of him today had to come from somewhere. So where? Instead of talking me through his origins, he gives me his mother's number and suggests I speak to her.

Damien's mother, Mary, is a minor art-world celebrity these days. Like Warhol's mother, or Hockney's, she's carved out a curious little niche for herself as a conspicuous maternal presence to whom a famous artistic son is unusually devoted. Mary lives in Devon with Damien, his girlfriend, Maia, a surfing designer, and their two boys, gentle Connor, 8, and naughty Cassius, 3. She has a separate house. You can't miss it. Outside is a big mailbox with Mary written on it in huge letters, as if she were a cartoon neighbour in a Tom & Jerry story.

I'd met Mary a couple of times before, at Glastonbury and the like, where her task was to remain sober and grounded while all around her drifted away to other planets. To be honest, I'd imagined her to be a touch flaky too, otherwise why would she be traipsing so dutifully along in the wake of her wayward son? I now see that I was wrong. Not only is she an interestingly responsible mother, she's also terribly wise and amusing. Damien's gift of the gab obviously comes from Mary. So, I suspect, does his fierce appetite for romance in uncertain ages.

Damien didn't know his father. 'Neither did I. Though I thought I did,' chirps Mary in a comfortable Yorkshire accent you want to trust. He was a photographer on Jersey. Mary met him while working on the island, and was absolutely besotted with him. 'I'm one of those people: it's all or nothing with me.'

The photographer would take pictures of tourists and then deliver the prints to them the next morning, which meant working in the darkroom through the night. Mary would hang around in there with him, and was soon pregnant. She arrived on Jersey as a 21-year-old virgin, and left a few months later with Damien inside her. The photographer didn't want to know.

She was unlucky to get pregnant, I suggest. Mary giggles. 'Oh yes, I never get away with anything.' She recently passed her driving test, and already she's been done for speeding. She would not consider an abortion. That would have been murder. So she went to Bristol and had Damien at a Catholic home for unmarried mothers run by nuns. Then she went back to Leeds and got married to a boy she'd grown up with called Hirst. But there was no passion there, and they are now divorced. To this day, she is afraid of phoning the Jersey photographer in case her heart starts fluttering again.

Damien, now 38, has never met his biological father.

Her parents were strict Irish Catholics, who loved Damien, a sweet and self-contained lad. 'He would always amuse himself. He'd never need amusing. He was a very quiet, very gentle and very caring child. Even now he is, but he doesn't let it show very much. He wanted to be the clown of the class. You give yourself these personas and they take over.' Young Damien was always drawing. 'I thought, he's going to do something with his art. I knew he would always do it. Even if he was a pavement artist or something.'

As for the Catholicism, she was a passionate churchgoer herself until Damien went to secondary school. She'd had two more children and fell out with her priest over issues she will only discuss with me off the record. It is not betraying her trust, I think, to record that her argument with the church concerned contraception. So these were Damien's origins. Mary calls him 'the best mistake I ever made'.

But the Catholicism he inherited from her would have been complex and active, rippling with guilts and confusions. She knows him better than anyone. But even she is surprised by the extraordinary reappearance of the papal faith in his work. 'I never thought that Catholicism had much effect on him.'

Damien has grown outrageously rich since we last met. He has negotiated a new deal with his gallery, and is now on 70:30, rather than the traditional 50:50. And he's been encouraging his artist friends to do the same. Why should an artist be on 50:50? he demands. Why indeed? While I'm there he buys a house that's come up for sale next to his studio. It takes him all of 10 seconds to decide.

Back at the studio, Damien's people make jokes about wishing he were still on the bottle. There was less work to do in the old days. Now he's insatiable. He doesn't see his clean new lifestyle as giving anything up. It's about gaining something. 'I suppose being sober is a bit like a new drug.
I think maybe I was running out of roads to go down and now I feel there are lots of them. I mean, I spent a good few years when I was either off my tits or recovering' - I know Damien, I know - 'and I think you devote a hell of a lot of time to that. One thing you definitely notice with having kids is that you want to wake up and be in the same state that they are in.'

Surely this has never been a problem for him? Damien has always been particularly adept at achieving creative childishness. His notorious spin paintings, those round pictures, covered in runny colours, that go for thousands of pounds in auction, home in ruthlessly on the child within. There's a machine for churning them out set up in his studio foyer. It is operated by a converted Black & Decker drill that he himself invented. And take it from me, it's great fun squirting kiddy colours onto madly revolving surfaces, and then watching them run hither and thither in exciting new patterns, just as they used to do on my annual childhood visits to the Ideal Home Exhibition. Damien has me produce four of the things: he pedals while I squirt.

The way he's managed to turn this banal kiddy process into excessively valuable Brit art provides intriguing proof of the fact that inside every stern adult with money to burn there resides a giggling toddler. Hirst senses this more acutely than any other artist practising in the world. It is one of the chief secrets of his success. When Charles Saatchi was showing me around his new museum in County Hall he suddenly blurted out that his favourite work of art in the world was Damien's Away from the Flock: a fluffy little white lamb suspended in formaldehyde. I thought Saatchi was going to start crying when he admitted this. He obviously identified like crazy with the lonely little lamb. Damien targets the vulnerable inner child in his collectors with the skill of a trained assassin in a Frederic Raphael novel.

Not that I think he does it cynically, just to sell his stuff. Being half Irish, he too is genetically primed to sob into his Guinness. I remember him standing up to speak when he won the Turner prize in 1995, and wistfully insist that his greatest creation was his son Connor. It was an admission straight from the soft Irish centre of his heart, an organ that does much of his thinking for him.

A heartless English wag in the audience, the low-grade English conceptualist Mark Wallinger, shouted out: 'So why don't you pickle him?' There were guffaws around the Wallinger table, but none from me. It was typical of Damien to out himself as a big softie at the coolest event in the British arts calendar.

To my mind, there is not a sliver of doubt that Damien Hirst's arrival on the art scene changed the relationship between modern art and the British people. Without him, I suggest, there would be no Tate Modern; or at least no hugely successful Tate Modern with long queues outside it. Before Damien Hirst came along, nobody queued to see contemporary art. I was there.

I remember the lack of public interest absolutely vividly. Then Damien unveiled his boxed sharks and his divided cows and suddenly Brit art was as newsworthy as Posh and Becks.

'I've always thought you have to get people listening to you before you can change their minds,' he explains. The pickled sharks, the expiring flies, the sliced-up pigs, are intent on getting themselves noticed, sure, but once they've done that, the message they seek to convey is a charmingly old-fashioned one. Life is short and precious. Death is dark and inevitable.

Given his exceptional impact, how perverse that when Tate Modern opened up, all they had on show of Damien's was a small cabinet in a poky corridor. Damien remains puzzled by this lack of Tate interest. He's spoken to the director, Nick Serota. He's even offered to give him work for free. But he has never heard back from the Tate. It's my turn to comfort him. The Tate doesn't do humanity, I tell him. They only do anally retentive modernist cool. The Tate hasn't taken to Damien for the same reason that vegans don't eat steaks. And Puritan churches don't contain big, gory blood-splattered crucifixions.

It's fair to say that nobody in the British art world has led his observers on such a ridiculous dance as Damien Hirst. He is, of course, the most famous Brit artist of them all, and an instantly recognisable brand name around the world. But maintaining this pre-eminence has involved keeping the surprises coming: a sapping effort. Whenever you expect him to skip to the left, he's skipped to the right. This mad waywardness has been a deliberate feature of his career.

But nothing he has done so far, no outrageous manoeuvre he has attempted, feels quite as risky or out of step with the timbre of the times as this wild-eyed return to the gory darknesses and impenetrable mysteries of his Catholic past

Romance in the Age of Uncertainty is at the White Cube Gallery, Hoxton Square, London N1, from September 10 to October 19, tel: 020 7749 7450


2003年7月13日 星期日

The Saatchi effect: Elton John builds gallery at home to show off his private art collection

Several of the nation's leading collectors are planning to put their works on public view for the first time

By James Morrison, Arts and Media Correspondent
Sunday, 13 July 2003

Encouraged by the success of Charles Saatchi's London gallery, a plethora of new "vanity museums" are being built by some of Britain's leading art collectors.

Encouraged by the success of Charles Saatchi's London gallery, a plethora of new "vanity museums" are being built by some of Britain's leading art collectors.

Sir Elton John is to build an extension to his Windsor home to put on public display his vast collection of paintings which includes seminal 20th-century artists from Picasso through Warhol to Damien Hirst.

Sir Peter Moores, the former head of Littlewoods, is about to open a £50m gallery at Compton Verney, an 18th-century Warwickshire manor designed by Robert Adam that sits in a 40-acre park landscaped by Capability Brown.

Not to be outdone, Frank Cohen, 60, the Mancunian DIY entrepreneur who in the 1970s was seen as the Saatchi of his day, is finally preparing to unveil his spoils. His collection, which covers "modern" artists from L S Lowry to the Chapman Brothers, will be made public as soon as he can find a building large enough to house it.

Meanwhile, a similar project is already under way at Crosby Hall, the elegant 15th-century mansion in Chelsea, London, that was once the home of Sir Thomas More. Here the controversial property magnate Christopher Moran is planning a gallery to showcase his extensive treasure trove of 16th- and 17th century furniture and decorative arts.

The unexpected display of beneficence is not confined solely to those who are planning to open their own private galleries. For the first time, Lord Lloyd-Webber has agreed to allow public access to his mammoth collection of Pre-Raphaelite and 20th- century art by loaning it to the Royal Academy for a three-month exhibition this autumn.

The architect Professor Colin St John Wilson, meanwhile, is about to go one step further. His collection of more than 200 works by artists as diverse as Walter Sickert and Peter Blake is to be offered on permanent loan to the Pallant House Gallery in Chichester, which is constructing a new wing to contain it.

News of the array of prospective private galleries is highlighted in the latest edition of the Museums Journal, a quarterly magazine published by the Museums Association. It comes just three months after the Saatchi Gallery reopened in County Hall, the former GLC headquarters on London's South Bank, amid a frenzy of naked models and schmoozing celebrities.

Opinion is divided in the art world over the reasons for this sudden wave of philanthropy. While there are few who do not welcome the thought of these eclectic collections being made public, sceptics sense that the scale of investment being bestowed on the new galleries owes as much to vanity as it does to charity.

The collectors themselves are having none of this. Sir Peter says it has always been his aim to offer the public the chance to view the artworks and antiquities owned by his foundation, which includes one of the finest collections of Chinese bronzes in the world.

"My idea was to have a museum in the country where people can come and have a nice day out but also absorb quality art, without having to go to galleries in sweaty cities," he said, explaining his choice of location. "I was brought up in a fairly arid suburb and I found out when I was at university that there were an enormous amount of things I knew nothing about. You can't shove people through doors, but you can open them and hope they are interested in going through, and that's what we're trying to do."

Mr Cohen, who is looking at a range of potential venues for his prospective gallery, including a listed Victorian market hall and a former mill, says he too has long planned to display his collection. "The thing about this is that you can't do it when you've hardly got a collection - it takes time to build one up," he said. "I've been collecting for over 30 years but it's only in the last four or five that I've really been in a position to think about doing this."

Mr Cohen, who intends to curate his own gallery, disputes the suggestion that one of the biggest incentives for collectors to make their work public is to "offload" their security on to someone else. Prof St John Wilson is open about the fact that he has been jumpy about housing his paintings in his own home since it was broken into 20 years ago.

Mr Cohen said: "Burglars can't sell my stuff in public. Where are they going to sell them? They're interested in Rolex watches and leather jackets. If they saw a piece of contemporary art on the wall they'd leave it hanging."

Not all observers are convinced by these explanations.

Cristina Ruiz, the deputy editor of the Art Newspaper, said: "I'm sure there's an element of pride or vanity there, particularly if you've spent years collecting things.

"Also, if your collection is quite large you have to start looking at things like security and insurance. It may be, that if you've got a publicly visible place to display them you are helped by the fact that the risk is borne by the gallery. It's easier to secure, it's outside your home, so from the point of view of security you are less at risk."

Frank Cohen (DIY entrepreneur)

What he owns: Eclectic 20th-century and contemporary collection. Recent purchases include Lowry's A Father and Two Sons and the Chapman Brothers' Unholy McTrinity.

Where we can see it: Coming soon to a converted 19th-century market hall, or possibly an old mill, in Manchester.

Sir Elton John (singer-songwriter)

What he owns: Paintings by Magritte, Picasso, Bacon and Warhol, photographs by Helmut Newton and Britart works by Damien Hirst, Tracey Emin and the Chapman Brothers.

Where we can see it: A new gallery to be built at Woodside, his £5m part-Georgian mansion in Windsor.

Sir Peter Moores (Littlewoods Pools heir)

What he owns: Priceless collection of Chinese bronzes dating from 1000BC, 16th- to 19th-century Neapolitan paintings and a selection of British folk art.

Where we can see it: Compton Verney, an 18th-century manor in Warwickshire, from next Easter.

Lord Lloyd-Webber (composer)

What he owns: 200 Pre-Raphaelite paintings and works by 20th-century masters, including Picasso's Angel Fernandez de Soto (left) and Canaletto's Old Horseguard's Parade.

Where we can see it: The Royal Academy in London for three months, starting in September.

Christopher Moran (property tycoon)

What he owns: Classic 16th- and 17th-century furniture from the workshops of Hardwick, and paintings including Van Dyck's St Jerome in Penitence.

Where we can see it: Crosby Hall, the 15th-century former home of Sir Thomas More in Chelsea.

Professor Colin St John Wilson (architect)

What he owns: Works by Independent Group artists and other 20th-century paintings such as Peter Blake's The 1962 Beatles, Michael Andrews's Thames: The Estuary as well as an Andrews portrait of Prof St John Wilson.

Where we can see it: A new wing of the Pallant House Gallery in Chichester, West Sussex.

UK buyers make major splash in list of the world's top 200 collectors

Thirteen Britons, including David Bowie, Sir Elton John and Lord Lloyd-Webber, have made it on to the latest definitive list of the world's top 200 art buyers.

Heiress Isabel Goldsmith, Littlewoods Pools millionaire Sir Peter Moores, DIY entrepreneur Frank Cohen and the Sainsbury family are also included on the annual list, compiled by the American magazine ARTnews.

The list, now in its 13th year, contains several surprises. While few will question the inclusion of Charles Saatchi, who regularly appears on it, eyebrows are bound to be raised about the identity of the only Brit to be named in the top 10: the London-based jeweller Lawrence Graff.

Ironically, Mr Graff, whose collection includes a diamond necklace worn by the Dowager Viscountess Harcourt at King George VI's coronation, for which he paid £1.87m, once famously commented: "I like to dabble in art, but my actual hobby is my business."

Less surprising are the mentions given to Ms Goldsmith and fellow Pre-Raphaelite enthusiast Lord Lloyd-Webber, or the rock stars Bowie and Elton, whose love of 20th-century paintings is well documented.

According to the list, the single biggest buyer over the past 12 months was Sheikh Saud al-Thani of Qatar, a London-based collector with a passion for impressionism, Old Masters and Islamic antiquities.

The other British-based collectors on the list are the Syrian-born multi-millionaire Wafic Said, Sir Graham Kirkham, executive chairman of DFS Furniture, shipping magnate Sami Ofer and the businessman Jeffrey Steiner.

The "ARTnews Top 200" was the brainchild of Milton Esterow, the magazine's editor and publisher. He says it has come to be taken increasingly seriously by the collectors themselves.

2003年6月7日 星期六

Pick of the week: Imagine. . . The Saatchi Phenomenon

From
June 7, 2003

Charles Saatchi is the first subject of the BBC's new arts series, but everyone knows it's really about Alan Yentob putting himself in the spotlight, says Caitlin Moran

In the frame

He is a millionaire Iraqi dictator who gained his power by brainwashing a nation. He has a fearsome temper. He likes monumental artworks to be associated with him. One of his friends even says, proudly: “He’s incredibly talented at hangings.” The only difference between Saddam Hussein and Charles Saatchi, however, is that Saatchi would never have given a tu’penny ha’penny interview to Tony Benn on the ITV news in the lead-up to the recent war. Indeed, as we discover in Alan Yentob’s unexpectedly interesting documentary, The Saatchi Phenomenon, the first in the new Imagine series on BBC One, until this very programme, only three seconds of television footage of Saatchi existed. This news — delivered in the context that Yentob has scored a considerable coup by getting Saatchi to agree to being filmed — immediately raises expectations that Saatchi, when he finally appears, is going to loom up as glamorous and fantastical as a yeti in a swimsuit, and shock us more than Sarah Lucas’s fried egg t***.

Of course, when Saatchi does finally appear — wandering around his new Saatchi Gallery on the South Bank a few weeks before opening, and, as promised, going “left a bit, right a bit” in a very committed way, which I presume is part of the process of being “incredibly talented at hanging” — he’s just a fat man in a pair of pegged trousers and a short-sleeved shirt, smoking ciggies and calling his partner, Nigella Lawson, “Petal”.

In the documentary that follows — which is essentially a high-class gossip-fest with the occasional shark in formaldehyde — we learn that Saatchi is inseparable from his short-sleeved shirt, that he used to get so enraged at Saatchi and Saatchi that he threw chairs at his brother Maurice’s head, and that Damien Hirst’s shark smells of fish. It all bodes well for the rest of the Imagine series, which covers the sculptor Barbara Hepworth, some Cuban ballet dancer whom you’ve never heard of, but who looks very cool, a think piece on hip-hop culture and Stella McCartney’s video diary.

Of course, the main focus of interest in Imagine isn’t really the subjects, however many gossipy nuggets are revealed about them — it’s Yentob’s leap over the desk from management to presenting. It generally seems to be considered slightly “off” — like Sir Alex Ferguson running angrily on to the pitch and scoring a goal after David Beckham has fallen over. Myself, I simply don’t have a problem with suits presenting programmes — from the audience’s point of view, you just want the most powerful, persuasive and well-connected person possible to be out there getting the goods. It’s why I truly hope that the next pope is a bit of a televisual wannabe. Previously, the only person who would have been able to persuade people such as the reclusive Saatchi and Stella McCartney to reveal themselves would have been Elton John’s partner David Furnish, who did a notoriously fluffy series on fashion designers last year for Channel 4. The investigative highlight of this was Furnish telling Donatella Versace: “You are amazing and you make people feel amazing — you know that?”

In this context, the worst that could be said of Yentob is that he is the highbrow David Furnish — while not averse to a bit of gossip and flattery himself, he still has a good journalistic eye for jazzing up a dry subject, his presenting style is quiet and unflashy — a bit like having a koala bear chatting to you — and if what it takes to get a new arts strand on BBC One is having it presented by the former controller of BBC Two, then so be it. Yentob has delivered the goods. And I should imagine his expenses claims go through without too many hitches as well.

Imagine, Wednesday, BBC One, 10.35pm; Wales, 11.05pm

CV: Alan Yentob

Born March 11, 1947

Background His parents were Jewish immigrants from Iraq. His father ran a successful textile firm in Manchester

Big break After joining the BBC as a trainee in 1968, he was given the chance to edit the award-winning Omnibus in 1973

Having a laugh As head of BBC Two, he commissioned Absolutely Fabulous and Have I Got News For You

Day job Appointed the BBC’s Director of Drama, Entertainment and Children’s Programmes in 2000

Still finds time to . . . Chair the ICA

2003年5月25日 星期日

Stephen Bayley: House the poor! Build a gallery! Save a hedgehog! Now that's rich

The rich are different. And they can make a difference. Stephen Bayley traces the history of giving generously, and unearths some unlikely links between Dante's Divine Comedy and Pink Floyd

Sunday, 25 May 2003

Provided they lend me their houses and take me for rides in their planes, I have no objection to the very rich. On the contrary, I am rather in favour. This will surely be a comfort to wealthy souls tormented by the irreconcilable conflict between limitless worldly pistonnage and the inevitable, cruel vectors of mortality. A Gulfstream can only suspend you for so long between the dust and ashes at the beginning and the end of life's excursion. Accordingly, great good has come out of the guilt and fear that good fortune and great wealth produce.

Provided they lend me their houses and take me for rides in their planes, I have no objection to the very rich. On the contrary, I am rather in favour. This will surely be a comfort to wealthy souls tormented by the irreconcilable conflict between limitless worldly pistonnage and the inevitable, cruel vectors of mortality. A Gulfstream can only suspend you for so long between the dust and ashes at the beginning and the end of life's excursion. Accordingly, great good has come out of the guilt and fear that good fortune and great wealth produce.

Whichever way you look at it, the journey from Dante's Divine Comedy to Pink Floyd is a long one, but last week brought them closer together. When Dante vilified his family, the financier Enrico Scrovegni - by way of expiation - promptly commissioned Giotto to decorate Padua's Arena Chapel and, hey presto, (this was about 1305), there was the Renaissance in painting. Now, while I can enjoyably hum "The Wall" along with the next man, it would be reckless to compare Dave Gilmour's artistic achievements with Giotto's. Still, his easy-going benevolence in giving away a handsome Maida Vale property to a housing charity shows what fun can be had, like Scrovegni, with the distribution of wealth. Gilmour's civic gesture is in specially nice contrast to the wince-making avarice of FTSE chief executive officers with their screw-you feather-bedding and spectacularly hypocritical short-termism.

I have - we all have - always thought how very amusing it would be to have vast wealth ... and give (almost all of it) away. Build a university! Parks! Galleries! Plant trees! A hedgehog recovery project! This is one of the most beguiling daydreams of them all, and the reason I do not - at least not yet - have vast wealth is that I have a tendency to daydream. And here is one of the many differences between the very rich and the rest of us. My experience is that people who have made a lot of money are very focused indeed. In fact, the rich are different from you and me because they tend to think not so much about what they might do with the money; rather they think of the money itself. This is as fundamental a divide in human personality as the left-brain, right-brain schism.

"I don't," I remember Terence Conran saying to me, "want to leave it to the kids or to the Inland Revenue." Thus, starting in 1979, began a remarkable adventure that resulted, through some canny philanthropy and a bit of nipping and tucking, in London's Design Museum. Conran's huge generosity in wanting to popularise design (and his brilliant insight of having me do it for him) was a classic of educated altruism, but it was also not without an element of opportunism, even commercial self-interest. While Conran's authentic enthusiasm for design proselytising (incurable, I caught it) cannot be questioned, the idea of funding a design museum had a subsidiary purpose. This was to create a virtuous circle. The more, the theory went, we educate the public in design, or - at least - our version of it, the more they will want to go and spend in our shops. The more they do this, the more we will make, and the more we will be able to educate them, and so on.

Bill Gates, boss of Microsoft, did something similar. His first major charitable contribution was giving away $60m of software in 1995. Then in 1997 the Gates Foundation wired 6,000 US libraries at a cost of $90m. Only a curmudgeon or a churl would be snitty about this because the democratic benefits are obvious but, on the other hand, there are plenty of curmudgeons and churls to be found. They said that was all very well, but what Gates was really doing was not so different morally from the drug dealer distributing small parcels of crack outside school. Through his charitable foundation, they said, Gates was forming a lifetime's addiction to Microsoft products, which he would then feed. It was, one critic said, as if the Ford Foundation restricted its charitable giving to automobile components, requiring its beneficiaries to buy Ford cars. Perhaps stung by these accusations, the Gates Foundation has turned its interest to vaccination.

As stimuli to philanthropy, guilt and fear are often joined by vanity. Here the Sainsburys come to mind. The family's benefactions have undoubtedly enhanced public life in Britain. We are all better off because Norman Foster's Sainsbury Centre at the University of East Anglia and Robert Venturi's National Gallery extension have been built on the profits from oven chips and industrial verdicchio. But, to present a contrarian view, we would all have been even better off if J Sainsbury plc had spent more money and effort on landscaping its wretched supermarkets and commissioning more dignified buildings from architects of talent and repute. This stratagem, however, would have been a less efficient way of feeding the voracious status-anxiety of uppity grocers.

But maybe I am being a bit cheap, as the poor are inclined to be. Quibble as we might, the sensibilities of Conran, Sainsbury and Saatchi are pointing in the right direction. The truth is that prosperous entrepreneurs in possession of a good fortune and feeling shifty about destiny are not a menace; they are an unexploited national asset. For every Conran, Sainsbury, Saatchi, Clore and Tate there are also brutally philistine magnates sitting on fizzing piles of moolah. What can stimulate these very chubby pussies to be generous? In our daydreams it is tempting to imagine terrifying legislation that might separate them from their dosh. But it is not ugly, punitive law-making we need to excite the moral responsibilities of the rich. What we need instead is more poets of Dante's stature to expose their boorish vice and folly, and shame them into interesting acts of popular munificence.

JP Morgan said of his ocean-going yacht Corsair, "Nobody who has to ask what a yacht costs has any business owning one". I am inclined to think that no one who demands extraordinary rewards from a public company - as Jean-Pierre Garnier, chief executive of GlaxoSmithKline, did last week - has any business running one. He could have redeemed himself with a promise of future acts of enlightened civic purpose, but that wouldn't be in character for a money-grubbing salaryman. The pharmaceutical company's annual general meeting had its revenge on its grabby chief executive. History irrefutably rewards the generous. There is not going to be a Garnier chapel. Conran, Gates, Sainsbury, Saatchi and Clore have all had the nerve and style to create decent projects of both particular and general benefit. And I happen to know that in each case they have a great deal left. Our new Dante might encourage them to be even more generous still.

Blake said: "Good and Evil are Riches and Poverty". There are good rich men and evil rich men. The good ones always feel inclined to give it away. As history shows...

2003年5月4日 星期日

Saatchi's new art row - this time it's personal

By James Morrison and Malaika Costello-Dougherty
Sunday, 4 May 2003

Charles Saatchi has done it again. Barely a fortnight after allowing the launch party for his new London gallery to be over-run by naked gatecrashers, the high priest of Britart has once more set tongues wagging – this time over rumours of a rift with his long-time collaborator, the art dealer Jay Jopling.

Charles Saatchi has done it again. Barely a fortnight after allowing the launch party for his new London gallery to be over-run by naked gatecrashers, the high priest of Britart has once more set tongues wagging – this time over rumours of a rift with his long-time collaborator, the art dealer Jay Jopling.

Though the art world is notorious for its squabbles and rivalries, the cause of the present contretemps is said to be more than usually personal. Jopling, sources say, is fuming at Saatchi's apparent decision to sell off all but one of the works by the dealer's wife, video and photographic artist Sam Taylor-Wood.

As if this weren't enough of a slight, Taylor-Wood has been omitted from Saatchi's new Thames-side gallery. And not one of her pieces – even the controversial update of Leonardo da Vinci's The Last Supper from Saatchi's era-defining 1997 Sensation exhibition at the Royal Academy – is name-checked in the glossy book published to accompany it. 100: The Work That Changed British Art features reproductions of 100 works, ranging from the notorious (Tracey Emin's My Bed) to the more obscure (White Canoe by Peter Doig), yet nowhere in its 220 pages is Ms Taylor-Wood's name mentioned.

As if to rub salt into her wounds, in his introduction to the volume, Saatchi writes about his love of "recent British art" and, implicitly, the items in his own collection. He describes the scene it represents as "pretty much the only art that will be worth more than a footnote in future chronicles of the 20th century".

Though evidence for the scale of Saatchi's disposal of Taylor-Wood's work is circumstantial, at least some of the 18 or more pieces by the artist that have appeared at auction in London and New York over the past two years are known to have hailed from his collection. These include Killing Time, a four-screened video installation, which was bought back by Jopling at Christie's for £17,625 in February last year, before being sold on to Tate Modern.

Sources close to Saatchi have confirmed that the former advertising tycoon now owns only one of her works, Spankers Hill, a photo of Ms Taylor-Wood dressed as a rabbit caught in a car's headlights. At the height of his promotion of the Young British Artists in the mid-1990s, he had a far larger number. Five were included in the Sensation show alone.

For Ms Taylor-Wood and her husband, whose gallery, White Cube, represents her, the perils of falling out of fashion with Charles Saatchi will be all too clear. The composition of Saatchi's collection at any one time is seen as such a barometer of prevailing tastes that his decision to sell off work by an individual artist can have a damaging effect on their market value.

One art market insider said of Ms Taylor-Wood's absence from Saatchi's new County Hall gallery: "You should put two and two together. I'm sure he's been selling her stuff. It's a real slight, although in the end it's probably a blessing for her. I think a lot of the work in the gallery comes off really badly. It's meant to be in a white space, and against the backdrop of County Hall a lot of it doesn't really work. He's proved he's an advertising expert – but not an art expert."

Neither Saatchi nor Jopling are showing any signs of going public with their differences. The Saatchi Gallery declined to comment, and a spokeswoman for White Cube said: "Jay's position is that he has no comment because there isn't an issue."