2006年9月3日 星期日

Portrait of an ex-husband's revenge

The vicious feud between artists Charles Thomson and his former wife, Stella Vine, has spilled over on to canvas. Anthony Barnes reports

Sunday, 3 September 2006

As an act of naked revenge, it is a work of art. The artist Stella Vine, who found fame when Charles Saatchi took her under his wing, is laid bare by her former husband in a series of explicit, humiliating nude portraits at a major exhibition.

The artworks will reignite a simmering feud between Vine and Charles Thomson, which has seen them trading verbal salvos in media interviews without actually exchanging a word with each other. Thomson - co-founder of anti-conceptual art movement the Stuckists - himself concedes the works will leave her "pissed off" and "angry".

His paintings, to be exhibited at the Stuckists' first major central London exhibition, are titled simply Stripper and Strip Club, though it is clear who inspired them. The publicity material for the show, which opens next month, even spells out that they are "explicit images of his ex-wife".

They will be seen by many as an act of revenge for the brevity of their marriage. Thomson, 53, said the works were not intended as a public attack, more a way of privately dealing with his own emotions through his art after their relationship crumbled.

Vine, 37, who formerly worked as a stripper, found notoriety when her painting of Diana, Princess of Wales, daubed with the words "Hi Paul, can you come over I'm really frightened", was exhibited by Saatchi.

As a former member of the Stuckists, her association with the collector infuriated her former compatriots who claimed she had taken their ideas and sidled up to the enemy. She achieved further notoriety when she created a work depicting Rachel Whitear, who had died of a heroin overdose, to the anger of the dead girl's parents.

Vine, who opens her own solo show at the Modern Art Oxford gallery next month, developed her skills attending classes at Hampstead School of Art, and after falling in with the Stuckists exhibited her work for the first time at a small display in Brixton, south London, in 2001. Within weeks she had married Thomson at a ceremony in New York's City Hall, but they separated within two months.

Thomson told The Independent on Sunday: "I did these paintings after we broke up - the sort of consolidation period. For me it was a way of working through the emotional after-effects. Basically she had told me a lot of stories about her time in the sex industry and really they were quite gutting. It wasn't very nice hearing them and it left a bit of an emotional scar on me. It was a way of getting them out of my system. I found it quite gruelling to do them."

The Stuckists emerged from a group of artistic friends who once counted Tracey Emin and her then boyfriend Billy Childish among their number. Their devotion to painting as an art form, instead of moving into other experimental areas, led to Emin condemning Childish as "stuck, stuck, stuck", hence the group's name.

Thomson, who stood for Parliament in 2001 against the then Culture secretary Chris Smith, has not spoken to his former wife for four years, although they have traded vicious barbs in newspaper interviews. She has claimed he "exploited" her and is "full of shit", while he has branded her "a mercurial character who thinks nothing about he pain she puts others through".

Thomson said it was the gallery that chose to exhibit the nudes, but he was unapologetic about showing them in public. "She will probably be very pissed off. She'll be angry and very upset because it is one rule for her and another for everyone else. She expects people to understand when she does it. She does Diana with blood coming out of her mouth and looking traumatised and it's fine, but that woman is a mother and her children are still alive.

"She claims it comes from deep within her and it is the same with my pictures. It comes from deep within me and it is important. If she does feel upset, it can't be half as upset as the parents of Rachel Whitear or Diana's sons."

Vine was keeping her counsel about the exhibition when she was informed by The Independent on Sunday. She said: "I have no comment. I've had my dealings with them [the Stuckists] over the past couple of years and I don't want to say anything more."

2006年8月30日 星期三

Artworks 'safe' after the Royal Academy goes up in in flames

By Geneviève Roberts
Wednesday, 30 August 2006

More than 60 firefighters were called to a blaze at a Royal Academy of Arts building in London.

The fire broke out yesterday at the former Museum of Mankind, now owned by the Royal Academy, in Piccadilly. Part of the roof and first floor was damaged, a London Fire Brigade spokesman said.

The three-storey building in Burlington Gardens was empty, undergoing renovations in order to show the exhibition USA Today: New American Art from The Saatchi Gallery. The exhibition, due to open on 6 October, is likely to be postponed, the Saatchi Gallery said.

The fire broke out on the west corner of the roof, a spokesman for the Royal Academy said. One eye-witness, Shannon Gordon, said: "All of a sudden I looked up and there were more flames. Then there was a big bang as the roof collapsed."

The fire started at 1.45pm yesterday, and was brought under control at 5.30pm.Nearby buildings, including the main Royal Academy site, were evacuated.

Mary Anne Stevens, Acting Secretary of the Royal Academy of Arts, said: "The carefully coordinated emergency procedures of the Royal Academy and the effective management of the incident by the fire and police services appear to have limited the damage to one gallery and the roof."

No works of art were believed to have been damaged. The Royal Academy's main site will be open today.

2006年7月23日 星期日

The Queen of Arts

From
July 23, 2006

She’s blonde and beautiful, with a reputation for rubbing people up the wrong way. So can the French-Canadian Louise MacBain fulfil her dream: to transform the British art world? By Giles Hattersley

Louise MacBain is an oddball. It isn’t the obvious things that make her so – those traits that will always separate a thin, blonde, North American multimillionairess from the rest of society. All that is surface, as Henry James, who should have invented her, might have said. More intriguing is what lies beneath.

The hazel eyes that dart with fear, the sudden bursts of sweetness and laughter, the urge to use 57 words when three will do, to say nothing of reports that she stepped out with Prince Andrew. On occasion, this art-world mogul also exhibits toxic sang-froid, as on the sweltering day we meet in the cafe of an organic supermarket in Notting Hill, west London. The room is baking, but MacBain is wearing a wool blazer and a caramel pashmina wrapped twice around her swan neck. As the thermostat creeps above 30C, the Québecois beauty sips from a large mug of piping-hot latte, but her brow never moistens and her lip gloss stays put.

As I’m pondering whether the blood of the 25th richest woman in Britain (£200m, according to The Sunday Times Rich List) literally runs cold, she confirms it certainly does metaphorically. Straightening her back, she announces that when she opens her new arts institute in London this October, “You know what we’re going to do? We’re going to bus in the poor people so they can see the exhibitions.”

This is unfortunate, because up to this point we had been motoring along nicely. Yes, she had been a little pretentious at times. Certainly she had dropped so many names (Calvin Klein… Renée Fleming… Vladimir Putin…) that I should have asked the waiter for a dustpan and brush. She was fun, though, and more sincere than I’d been led to believe by some of her acquaintances. But – the poor people? What is the would-be Saatchi envisaging, I wonder? These so-called poor, awestruck at the sight of a James Turrell installation or an Antony Gormley sculpture? Will MacBain look on, saintlike, as poverty and social disease melt away in the face of spot paintings? Probably. After all, this is a woman who once extolled the benefits of opera for the blighted children of Sudan.

For those wondering who this unusual creature is, MacBain is a 47-year-old French-Canadian bombshell who exploded into British high society in the late 1990s, cash-rich but socially impoverished – though she disputes that analysis. “I didn’t just appear out of nowhere,” she corrects me, arching an eyebrow. “I am not this Mary Poppins of the art world that people imagine.”

After securing an impressive fortune in her 2001 divorce from her second husband, John MacBain (they built and ran Trader.com, the publishing conglomerate responsible for magazines such as AutoTrader), society watchers scoffed as madame set about evolving from an Alexis Carrington-style wife (who supposedly wore apricot-sized jewels to the office) into a sleek patron of the arts and high-profile philanthropist.

It is said that MacBain discovered art in the late 1990s when she began dating the devastatingly charming Simon de Pury, the celebrity auctioneer and art expert. She even went into business with him, taking a job as chief executive of the auction house Phillips de Pury & Company, which he co-owned. The joke is that he played Professor Higgins to her Eliza Doolittle, ironing out her manners and schooling her in contemporary art. Again she denies this, saying, “I didn’t need any doors opening. They were all open anyway.” Later the company floundered and the couple split up, but the art bug had bitten. MacBain bought Art + Auction and Modern Painters, the art industry’s most revered magazines, set up the website Artinfo.com (a sort of cultural Bloomberg service), reportedly dated Prince Andrew for several months, then last year (when a large instalment from her divorce settlement arrived) launched her charity: the Louise T Blouin Foundation.

Through a series of think-tanks, research projects, award ceremonies and sponsored artistic endeavour, the foundation’s ambitious aim is to harness culture to solve problems from conflict in the Middle East to misguided education policy. It’s unclear exactly how this might work, but it could involve Palestinian and Israeli actors putting on a play together, an exhibition of new Chinese art, or seminars on how best to teach science in schools. It will also do a nice sideline in neurobiology.

Predictably, MacBain’s metamorphosis has received frosty reviews, especially in the British art world – a snooty bunch at the best of times. She talks lovingly of recently “upgrading” her collection of Gormleys, Hirsts and Koonses, but many think this enthusiasm is faux. Though some auctioneers and agents will praise her publicly (as a significant collector she is putting millions their way), the received wisdom is that she is to cultured society what bindweed is to garden walls: a pugnacious climber.

This autumn, MacBain hopes to change all that. In October, she will open a hugely expensive, self-funded arts institute in west London. It will host exhibitions, conferences and occasional bouts of contemporary dance. Yet detractors believe it has more to do with self-decoration than philanthropy. It is, they say, an elaborate ploy to secure those rare treasures money still can’t buy: deference, intellectual respect and a place at the big boys’ table at New York fundraisers and Venetian gallery openings.

Her supporters, however, insist MacBain’s endeavours arise from a personal and long-held passion for the arts. “Louise has a missionary’s zeal,” says Sir Martin Sorrell, the advertising magnate and an adviser to her foundation.

“I think she’s genuinely trying to use her influence – both economic and social – to do some good. I don’t believe she’s doing it for egotistical reasons at all.” The artist Jeff Koons tells me, “she has a great desire to contribute,” while Professor Colin Blakemore, the chief executive of the Medical Research Council, says: “Louise is enormously energetic, has a high degree of integrity and is very convincing.”

Either way, when the Louise T Blouin Institute (T for Thérèse, Blouin is her maiden name) arrives, it will be the most high-profile British-museum opening since Charles Saatchi’s on the South Bank. As the space, or rather, multipurpose spaces, will host a range of art forms – including film and music – it could become a serious rival to the struggling ICA (Institute of Contemporary Arts). At 35,000 sq ft, the MacBain institute is already six times bigger. Members of the advisory board include Sir Christopher Frayling, Jeremy Irons and Bianca Jagger. But will fervent interest in its figurehead eclipse all that? Already rumours abound that MacBain (who, despite being resident in Britain, recently moved most of her business concerns to New York and put her £28m Holland Park mansion on the market) has lost heart and is skulking back across the Atlantic nursing a bruised ego. You must be worried, I say. Your institute isn’t even open, and already London society has defeated you. “No, no! Don’t listen to these people,” she cries. “I love London. I’m staying in London.” Her voice sounds uncannily like Céline Dion’s. “We all feel fear sometimes, but is this the most scary thing I’ve done? Non. This is London. This is easy.”

Two weeks earlier, in a former factory in Shepherd’s Bush (“It’s Holland Park, actually,” snaps the architect), MacBain is picking her way through piles of industrial debris in a pair of pencil-thin high heels. They aren’t the shoes one normally wears on a building site, even if you’re bankrolling it, but MacBain says she likes them – “they make me taller, bigger, more confident.”

How curious – her facade is as confident as her ambition seems naked. I had been warned that MacBain even had a superiority complex, but there is something under-confident about her, frail even, especially in the rare moments when she relaxes. When anxious, which is often, her default settings are pretension and boastfulness, reeling off statements like, “I’m off to Russia next week, where I’ll see President Putin,” or, “I built a large multinational company. I establish things. I meet wonderful children in need of help.”

Today, MacBain sports expensive highlights, a perfect manicure, 7 jeans, sun-kissed skin and bee-stung lips – in short, the kind of east-coast American glamour that makes every British woman look like an unmade bed. She drove herself here in a black Mini from her nearby mansion, where I had begged to interview her and to which she refused me entry. It is, by all accounts, vast, full of museum-quality art and manned by uniformed, French-speaking staff.

The institute is similarly elaborate: spanning three storeys, the ceiling of its entrance hall stands 35ft high. Overlooking the celebrity photographer Mario Testino’s studio and the offices of groovy Chrysalis, MacBain believes this could be the new Hoxton, as far as culture goes. “On time and on budget,” she says, which means her patch of the old factory will have set her back about £20m.

The previous day we had met at a hotel, where she laid out the game plan for me. Having chaired a successful seminar with Bill Clinton – another friend – earlier this year, once she’s done opening the institute she will host the Global Creative Leadership summit in New York, where Calvin Klein and Henry Kissinger, among others, will talk art, politics, science and commerce. This will be an annual event.

“We’re in a world where we have to understand culture, now more than ever,” she says, citing the fallout from the Norwegian cartoons of Muhammad last year. She then bemoans how being exposed to the world through the internet and instant news has made us more nationalistic. “The French want to keep their truffles, but they also have to be part of the world. Part of the problem is that there’s no president of the world,” she sighs. Would you like that job? Her laughter tinkles, but she doesn’t rule it out.

But why bother, I ask? Why not just use the money you’ve made and have a little fun?

“It all started with my mother, really, who took me to every single museum in Montreal when I was young,” she says uncertainly. MacBain never discusses her private life. “She was also very involved in volunteer work, so I learnt about that too. These days we forget that North America has some good things, and one of them is that we are brought up with a sense to thank for what we have and to share it. It’s like the Medici times: local families contributing to local causes. We were taught to give more than to receive. That was the priority.” But your parents were hardly the Medicis. Weren’t they insurance brokers? “My parents owned a life-insurance company,” she cries. “They were not brokers like it’s been reported. They owned it. It’s so important to know that,” she says, then blushes a little at her forcefulness.

In previous profiles her mother has been cast as a latter-day Mrs Bennet, a middle-class matron keen to marry off her five daughters as far up the ladder as possible. If so, she outdid herself with her elder daughter, Hélène, who wed a Desmarais, the Canadian equivalent of a Rockefeller or a Carnegie. But for Louise, the youngest, marriage proved trickier. Her first, to the tobacco heir David Stewart was annulled. “I was 21 and it only lasted a few months. He was a wonderful man, but it had to be cancelled.” On what grounds? “Oh no, I can’t say… too personal. It was very difficult to get an annulment from the Catholic church. We had to ask the Pope.”

For tragic reasons, she was more interested in work, anyway. For almost her entire childhood, until he succumbed to cancer when she was 15, her father was dying. “It’s not unusual to want to look after yourself when you’ve had a father who is ill. So when I was 16 I said to my mother that I didn’t want her to worry about me, that I wanted her to benefit from any financial resources she was left with. So I started work, doing the accounts for a little lamp store, then for my brother, who had a computer firm.”

When she was 10, MacBain was diagnosed as dyslexic, but she had a magic way with numbers. To this day, she says, she finds a good balance sheet “comforting”. She left convent school at 19, got a job as a financial analyst for an investment bank, then met John, whom she married at 27 and has three teenage children with. The pair bought Trader together in 1987 for $3.9m and built it to a peak value of around $2.7 billion, employing about 5,000 people on 400 magazines in 25 countries.

MacBain says: “We had great success, but the more I think about my life now, the more I think I’m getting closer to the person I was at 16” – meaning when she was at her most tenacious. Along with Bill Gates, she says she was one of the first to foresee the power of the internet in the early 1990s. “There will always be people who doubt me, but you have to believe in yourself, to try to find your confidence. When the nuns at my school told me I was stupid because I couldn’t write well, I fought harder.” She also sailed competitively, which she adored. “Speed, strategy, getting in touch with my body,” she says, stretching voluptuously. “I found my confidence in being better than the other guy. I found my confidence in winning.”

But despite becoming outrageously wealthy, she says confidence became an issue in her adult life because she was ashamed of her dyslexia. When she was 39, living in Geneva, she made a breakthrough. She found a book that praised the dyslexic brain for its cross-disciplinary thinking, and listed Albert Einstein and Sir Richard Branson as fellow sufferers. “What a great list to be on, right?” she smiles.

She’d been collecting for 15 years (“furniture, then pictures, then photography”), so after decades spent elbow-deep in the grim day-to-day running of a multinational, she decided to combine her hobby with her work. “I love beauty and I love talent, so that’s what I did. Now I enhance people’s creativity.” And your own social standing, too? “No, I’m not a socialite. I only go to parties to help people.” I snigger . “Seriously. It’s like work.” And you’re a workaholic? “Yes.”

Back in the cafe, we dust ourselves down after the whole “poor people” disaster, and MacBain, to her credit, says that “when you’re in poverty it can be pretty hard to appreciate anything.” I ask why she thinks so many people don’t like her. “In my life there are always jealous people, and the people who are the worst for it are the ones who don’t build anything themselves.” Does it get you down? “No. My mother said, ‘There will always be people who have more than you, too. Look up to them.’” Is London worse for this sort of thing? “Well, the press is harsher.” Such as ending up on the front of the tabloids with Prince Andrew? “Yes. But then, I am the press too,” she adds, referring to the art magazines she owns. “So on some level I understand. I’ve had this kind of focus for years, and it doesn’t bother me. Sometimes I don’t even read it,” she adds grandly, which I don’t believe.

Despite selling her house, she is staying in London but downsizing – buying a penthouse in Lord Foster’s Albion Riverside building in Battersea and keeping the sales division of her magazines and the charity offices here, too. Last year she bought adjacent apartments in the new Richard Meier building in New York, but says she can’t spend too much time there for tax reasons. I tell her my favourite MacBain story is the one about her buying the top floor for $20m, realising there was no space for her washing machine, then buying the one below for $15m. She squeals with laughter. “Who told you that?! People will just say anything. In fact, I bought it for my children, but they’ll both be fantastic for my collection,” she smiles. “It’s all about art with me. Art, art, art!” she trills.

Since she has finally relaxed, I risk a question about her love life. I hear you’re dating the American broadcaster Charlie Rose? “No, I’m not,” she replies, stern again. “Charlie is a great friend, like any other.” So you’re single?

“I’m not telling you.” Instead, she describes a lonely life of 17-hour work days, rising at five to read the papers before an hour and a half of pilates, and jogging at seven. MacBain is obsessed with her health. With her father’s early death and her mother’s more recent diagnosis with Alzheimer’s, who can blame her? Soon to turn 50, she says she worries she won’t get everything done in time. Rather than the story of a social climber, perhaps MacBain’s tale has a different theme: fear of death?

“The real problem,” says Sorrell, “is that she’s too blonde, too Canadian and too female to have done so well. People don’t like it.” “She can probably seem overambitious,” agrees Blakemore. “She wanted to solve all the problems of the world with $60m. But it would be a great pity if London shrugged its shoulders just because she’s ambitious.”

Palestine, China, poverty, education reform – foundations with far more money fight and fail in these arenas. And how much will conferences and cultural exchange help, never mind a gallery in a leafy London borough? But MacBain’s is a worthwhile effort. “I want everyone to come and visit the institute to judge for themselves,” she says – and no doubt they will. She can be socially awkward, highly strung and overly grand, but it could have been so much worse. She could have spent it all on diamonds.

2006年6月8日 星期四

Nine years on, a new sensation arrives at the Royal Academy

By Louise Jury, Arts Correspondent
Thursday, 8 June 2006

The 35ft-high statue by Damien Hirst in the Royal Academy's entrance courtyard spells it out: the Sensation generation is back.

Nine years after the Young British Artists created a storm when Charles Saatchi lent the Academy the highlights of his collection for its now-legendary "Sensation" show, eight have returned to exhibit works in this year's summer exhibition.

The body of work this year from Sensation artists including the Chapman brothers, Tracey Emin, Marcus Harvey and Sarah Lucas, constitutes a deliberate "small reunion," in the words of the academician Tom Phillips, who invited them to take part.

Some have exhibited works in the summer exhibition before. But only one - Gary Hume - has so far been elected to the Royal Academy though Jake and Dinos Chapman and Emin have made clear their aspiration to belong to the 238-year-old artists' club. The Chapmans point out their desire for membership in the title of their small oil painting: Two Little Pixies Happy as Hell on Reception of the News that Jake and Dinos are Finally Receiving Their RA, As Promised. Thank you very much for your kind attention.

Phillips described the inclusion of this generation as "a welcome return to the scene of their still controversial triumph".

Damien Hirst's enormous sculpture, Virgin Mother, weighs 14 tons and is not for sale. But the majority of the 1,300 works in the summer exhibition are. In addition to pieces by Royal Academicians, including Anish Kapoor, Richard Long and Elizabeth Blackadder, around 890 works by members of the public were selected out of nearly 10,000 submitted for consideration.

David Mach, 50, one of the younger RAs and a co-ordinator this year, said he believed they had given the show "a bit of elegance that sometimes it doesn't have". The change in feel starts as soon as visitors arrive in the front courtyard to be confronted by Hirst's sculpture. "That looks really different," he said.

He added: "The Royal Academy is very sluggish but it feels to me that we're opening up a bit and taking lots of things on board and changing. It is important for a big institution like this to change every decade."

Ken Howard, RA, agreed. "It's very important that the Academy doesn't stand still. We've got to encourage and even invite one or two younger artists to put work in," he said. "On the other hand, there are probably about 10 works by Sensation and the YBAs out of 1,300 so obviously we're not bending over backwards."

The Royal Academy Summer Exhibition, which is sponsored by Insight Investment, runs from 12 June until 20 August. Admission is £7

2006年4月27日 星期四

At Spring Auctions, Big Names Are Selling, and Being Sold

Published: April 27, 2006

Christie's

Picasso's "Repose" is estimated to bring up to $20 million.

Correction Appended

Some of the greatest hits in art history are coming to Sotheby's and Christie's in Manhattan this weekend: a van Gogh portrait of Madame Ginoux, the proprietress of the Café de la Gare in Arles, France, which the artist frequented until his suicide in 1890; a 1941 Picasso painting of his mistress Dora Maar with a black cat perched on her shoulder, not publicly seen for more than 40 years; and a haunting 1902 Blue Period Picasso of Germaine, one of his earliest muses.

Lovers of postwar and contemporary art will have lots to ogle this weekend too: a Warhol soup can with its top cut open; three of Donald Judd's signature wall stacks; Jeff Koons's vacuum cleaners encased in a Plexiglas box; even a lamb submerged in formaldehyde by Damien Hirst. (Phillips, de Pury & Company also has a sale of contemporary art on May 11, filled with newer works by some of today's hot artists.)

Those studying the catalogs of the important auctions of Impressionist, modern, postwar and contemporary art — two weeks of back-to-back sales starting Tuesday — may wonder who is selling these famous images, and why. It is the pros who are cashing in this season. As the art market continues to spiral upward, the consignors are, for the most part, familiar names in the art world. Not only do they believe that rising prices make it the right moment to sell, but they also see many new collectors. In the last year the newly rich from markets like Russia and Asia have become a presence at auctions.

Some sellers are seasoned collectors, like the British advertising executive Charles Saatchi and his ex-wife, Doris; the newsprint magnate Peter Brant; and the financiers Eli Broad of Los Angeles, Mitchell P. Rales of Washington and Henry R. Kravis of New York. A surprising number of dealers are also selling works, among them Irving Blum of Los Angeles and his ex-partner Joseph Helman, as well as Marianne Boesky and Christophe Van de Weghe of New York. Several well-known names are parting with works, among them Happy Rockefeller; L. Dennis Kozlowski, the former chairman and chief executive of Tyco International; and Gunter Sachs, the German industrialist who became famous in the 1960's as a playboy who married Brigitte Bardot. Even two former chief executives of Phillips are trying their luck at auction this season: Daniella Luxembourg and Louise T. Blouin MacBain. (Ms. MacBain gave her business to Christie's, Ms. Luxembourg to Sotheby's.)

The record-breaking prices at last fall's auctions in New York and those in London in February encouraged sellers, making the war between Sotheby's and Christie's so cutthroat that both houses have been doling out large guarantees — undisclosed amounts promised to sellers regardless of a sale's outcome — to win the business. Their financing arrangements also include giving sellers a percentage of the buyer's premium and finding third parties to supply some of the money necessary to make good the guarantees.

"There's definitely a greater demand for guarantees," said David Norman, a co-chairman of Impressionist and modern art for Sotheby's worldwide. "People feel they are selling in a strong market, but they also want protection."

But when big money is on the table, auction house executives are inevitably anxious. What they cannot sell either at auction or immediately afterward at a lower price, they must store in their warehouses, sometimes for years. Still, all say the market is so hot they are not concerned about their guarantees.

"This season was deal driven; it was not about specific loyalties," said Brett Gorvy, a co-head of postwar and contemporary art at Christie's. "For the best material we had to stretch and be very aggressive."

Two of the top paintings at Christie's Impressionist and modern art auction on Tuesday night — the van Gogh and the 1932 Picasso — have no such strings attached. "The sellers felt that a guarantee wasn't necessary when selling such iconic works in a market as majestic as it is today," said Guy Bennett, head of Christie's Impressionist and modern art department.

By far its most famous image is van Gogh's "L'Arlésienne, Madame Ginoux" (1890). One of the most recognizable faces in art history, the subject was painted extensively by both van Gogh and Gauguin. Christie's estimates the work could fetch $40 million to $60 million.

Christie's also has two important Picassos. The earliest, from 1902, is the Blue Period portrait of Germaine, which Christie's estimates at $12 million to $18 million. The other, "Repose," a startling, almost demonic 1932 depiction of Picasso's mistress Marie-Thérèse Walter, is being sold by Bernard Picasso, the artist's grandson. Christie's expects it will bring $15 million to $20 million.

The next night Sotheby's counters with a Picasso it is betting will sell for $50 million. "Dora Maar With Cat" is a large canvas — 50½ inches by 37½ inches — depicting the subject in a large wooden chair with a black cat perched at her shoulder. For more than 40 years the painting has been in the Gidwitz family of Chicago. Sotheby's has admittedly taken a big gamble: experts believe it has given the sellers a guarantee that is around $50 million.

Although the Picasso is its prize painting, the cover image of Sotheby's sale catalog is Matisse's "Reclining Nude, View of Her Back" (1927), estimated at $12 million to $15 million. While the catalog does not designate the seller, art experts say he is Mr. Kravis.

Sotheby's is also auctioning two paintings famous for reasons other than artistic merit. Tyco is selling the Monet and the Renoir that once belonged to Mr. Kozlowski and have been at the center of a tax evasion scandal; he was indicted in 2002 for evading more than $1 million in New York State taxes by having art dealers ship empty boxes to Tyco's offices in New Hampshire while having messengers bring the paintings to his Fifth Avenue apartment.

As in the last several years, the postwar and contemporary market is exploding. This season Christie's sale on May 9 is packed — 94 lots — and starts at 6:30 p.m., a half-hour earlier than usual. The sale includes 26 Donald Judd sculptures that the Judd Foundation is selling to create an endowment to support its permanent installations in New York and Texas. Primarily late works from the 1980's and early 90's, they range in estimate from $30,000 to $40,000 for a small wood block from the 1960's to $1.5 million to $2 million for a 1993 stacked plywood sculpture. Getting the foundation's property was highly competitive; Christie's promised it more than $20 million.

It also had to give a generous guarantee to Mr. Blum, who has been selling portions of his collection over the years. This season he is parting with "Small Torn Campbell's Soup Can (Pepper Pot)," an early hand-painted work from 1962 estimated at $10 million to $15 million. (Experts say Christie's has guaranteed Mr. Blum about $10 million.)

Sotheby's has invested a lot of money on another Pop figure: Roy Lichtenstein, whose 1964 painting "Sinking Sun" is being sold by Mr. Helman. Sotheby's experts believe it will bring around $20 million. (Experts say it has guaranteed the painting for around $17 million.)

Collectors and dealers frequent Phillips for less expensive, more cutting-edge images. Phillips's May 11 sale features the work of popular painters like Elizabeth Peyton, Peter Doig and Marlene Dumas. Michael McInnis, its worldwide director of contemporary art, said about 20 percent of the sale comes from dealers and the rest from collectors. "People are inspired by the recent high prices," he said. "They feel it's too good to ignore the potential returns."

Correction: April 28, 2006

A front-page capsule yesterday about art auctions at Sotheby's and Christie's referred incorrectly to plans for Picasso's "Dora Maar With Cat" and other works. While they will be shown starting this weekend, the sales start Tuesday. They will not be up for auction this weekend.

2006年4月3日 星期一

Unknown artist's exhibition illustrates the enduring influence of Charles Saatchi

By Terry Kirby, Chief Reporter
Monday, 3 April 2006

Annie Kevans is a relatively unknown and struggling artist who lives in a council flat, works part time as a secretary and puts in long hours at her studio in London's East End. But her fortunes could be about to change with the opening this week of the first solo show of her paintings at a small gallery in Shoreditch.

Kevans, like Tracey Emin before her, is one of the young artists whose careers have benefited from the patronage of Charles Saatchi, arguably Britain's most important art collector.

Although his gallery at County Hall closed amid acrimony last December and his new exhibition space in London will not open for another year, the progress of Saatchi-endorsed artists such as Kevans, Conrad Shawcross and Toby Ziegler (see box) suggests that his influence on the contemporary art world remains as strong as ever.

Despite the lack of anywhere to display his unrivalled private collection of modern art and suggestions that he has lost his touch for spotting the next generation of art superstars, Mr Saatchi is still exhibiting work online and, more importantly, is still personally trawling small galleries and exhibitions, as well as the degree shows of the art colleges, and buying obsessively.

Karen Wright, the editor of Modern Painters magazine said: "He's looking for new material for his gallery. Mr Saatchi wants to demonstrate that he is still around. He leads with his eyes and collecting is a personal passion."

Kevans, she said, was only one of many artists bought recently by Mr Saatchi. "Philip Ziegler is very talented and Shawcross is an almost certain nominee for the Turner Prize in the future.''

Although Mr Saatchi often picks up such works relatively cheaply, his patronage alone can lead to an artist's prices rising, often allowing him to make a substantial profit later on.

Whether or not Kevans eventually achieves a status comparable to Emin or Damien Hirst, now said to be worth £100m, artistic immortality is likely to remain out of reach. Mr Saatchi has said that most contemporary artists will be viewed as footnotes by history and that most installation art "ends up rotting in a dumpster".

He has also proved ruthless about selling works that no longer take his fancy. And the sheer volume of his collection means that the competition for places at his new gallery, a former barracks in Chelsea, is strong.

Mr Saatchi bought Kevan's work Boys, consisting of 30 black and white paintings of dictators and war criminals, such as Hitler, Pol Pot and Radovan Karadzic, portrayed as children, when it was shown at the BA degree show at Central St Martins College of Art and Design in London, in the summer of 2004. She said: "I was pleased because it was a BA show and he normally only goes to MA shows. I'm hoping that it will be shown at the new gallery. I know he has had it framed, because I was asked to go and chose a frame with him, but I was too scared."

At 33, Kevans is a relatively late starter as a professional artist. Although she had wanted to paint since she was a child, she did not attend art college until she was 24 and then only part time. Her first solo exhibition opens at Studio 1.1, an artists collective gallery in east London, on Friday, and features a series of paintings of actresses and singers such as Charlotte Church and Jodie Foster, who first found success as child stars,

"Charles Saatchi's interest has been brilliant for my career, because its very difficult to get yourself established after leaving college," she said. "Lots of other collectors have expressed interest as a result. It can't help but get you noticed."

Her agent, Flora Fairbairn, said she hoped Boys would be shown at Chelsea next year. It was due to be part of the Triumph of Painting exhibition, postponed when the County Hall gallery closed last December in a dispute with its Japanese landlords. But, she said: "Saatchi is now buying so much, it is difficult to know what he is going to show or not.

"While it has been good for Annie, she is capable of success without his help. Many artists don't want to sell to him because if he sells you on quickly, it doesn't do a lot for your reputation.''

The opening of the new Saatchi Gallery in Chelsea is likely to reinforce Mr Saatchi's pre-eminence on the London art scene. Previews on his website show a series of large, open spaces, very different from the small rooms at County Hall, the former offices of the Greater London Council.

Ms Wright said: "People have suggested [Mr Saatchi] has lost his touch, but I think he is back in favour and people are happy to be bought by him. He has shown his ability to reinvent style and space and now believes he can do it anywhere."

Other protégés

* TOBY ZIEGLER

Sold a landscape painting to Saatchi for under £10,000 18 months ago and has since seen his work soar in value.

Ziegler, 33, trained at Central St Martins - the alma mater of many of the Young British Artist crowd - and now works from a studio in London.

Since being picked up by Saatchi, he has staged his first solo exhibition where his mixture of painting, sculpture and installation won plaudits from the critics.

* DAMIEN HIRST

One of the first and most famous of Saatchi's artists, He is worth an estimated £100m and is due to stage a new exhibition in London next year. His pickled shark was exhibited in the Sensation show at the Royal Academy in 1997. Saatchi bought it for £50,000 before selling it back to Hirst. An American collector bought it two years ago for £7m

* CONRAD SHAWCROSS

Son of royal biographer William Shawcross, the sculptor, 28, sold one of his mechanical machines to the collector for £26,000 two years ago.

Last year he sold five copies of a film he made of another of his machines for £45,000 and is now moving from a second floor studio above a cash and carry in east London to 5,000 sq feet of new space, partly as a result of Saatchi's patronage.

* TRACEY EMIN

Saatchi's taste was derided when he paid £150,000 for Emin's unmade, detritus-strewn bed six years ago. It is now worth £1M. Saatchi has said: "I was very slow to get the loopiness of Tracey's work. I'm a helpless fan now."

2006年4月2日 星期日

Saatchi scoops up new British art talent at budget prices

From
April 2, 2006

CHARLES SAATCHI, the art collector who discovered and then disowned Britart, has snapped up the works of a new breed of young artist.

He has scoured obscure galleries, small exhibitions and final degree shows, and paid modest rates of £1,000 to £5,000 for the works of 20 young Britons.

Saatchi’s purchases have the power to move markets and any artist who becomes his protégé can expect to make a fortune. Many of the exhibits will go on display in spring 2007 when his latest gallery opens in Chelsea, west London.

His past favourites include Damien Hirst, who recently put his wealth at £100m. He sold a pickled shark to Saatchi for £50,000 before buying it back and selling it on to an American collector in 2004 for £6.25m.

The value of Tracey Emin’s My Bed — which featured soiled sheets and empty bottles of booze — is thought to have risen to more than £1m six years after Saatchi paid £150,000 for it.

Saatchi, who is married to Nigella Lawson, the author and celebrity cook, bought the work of Annie Kevans, a 33-year-old British artist, at her final degree show at London’s St Martin’s School of Art.

Her work, called Boys, consisted of black and white portraits of children who went on to become dictators. Kevans used childhood photos of Hitler, Pol Pot, Nicolae Ceausescu and Radovan Karadzic as the basis of her pictures.

“A deal was concluded and a car came to collect the works,” Kevans said.

Thanks to the Saatchi purchase, Kevans now has her first solo exhibition, Girls, opening this week at the Studio 1.1 gallery in east London. The paintings depict actresses and singers who were child stars — such as Brooke Shields, Shirley Temple, Jodie Foster, Britney Spears and Charlotte Church.

The portraits are all somewhat suggestive: Spears is depicted in her bra, while Shields is shown at 12, when she became famous as a hooker in the film Pretty Baby.

There is no obvious pattern to Saatchi’s purchases from young artists. He recently bought Swarm, two miniaturist sculptures from Tessa Farmer, 27, for £3,500 and £4,000. The works, now united in one piece, are made up of insects. “Of course I was pleased,” Farmer said.

Toby Ziegler’s 12ft by 9ft landscape painting, Designated For Leisure, was bought 18 months ago by Saatchi for less than £10,000 from an exhibition at London’s Royal Academy. Since then Ziegler’s work has appreciated in value.

Conrad Shawcross, 28, son of William Shawcross, official biographer of the late Queen Mother, sold a sculpture to Saatchi two years ago, while Lynette Yiadom Boakye, who is of Nigerian origin, and Donald Urquhart, have sold him portraits of women.

An East End show of nocturnal scenes in charcoal by Reece Jones, who trained at the Royal Academy, was bought in its entirety. Other artists to catch Saatchi’s eye include Ged Quinn, Liz Neal, Lucy Skaer and Mario Rossi.

Saatchi, who has in recent years sold much of his Britart work, said in late 2004 that most of the movement’s controversial figures will be “nothing but footnotes” in art history.